Re-examining the early history of the Leiden jar: Stabilization and variation in transforming a phenomenon into a fact

Re-examining the early history of the Leiden jar: Stabilization and variation in transforming a phenomenon into a fact

Cibelle Celestino Silva

Peter Heering

September 1, 2018

en

Journal Article

Cibelle Celestino Silva

Peter Heering

Journal Article

10.1177/0073275318768418

0073-2753

In this paper, we examine the period that immediately followed the invention of the Leiden jar. Historians of science have developed narrations that emphasize the role of grounding during the process of charging the jar. In this respect, this episode shows significant aspects that can be used to characterize science, scientific knowledge production, and the nature of science. From our own experimentation, we learned that grounding was not necessary in order to produce the effect. These experiences inspired us to go back to primary sources. In doing so, we came to a new understanding of the early period after Kleist’s and Musschenbroek’s initial creation of the effect. From our analysis, we conclude that it is not the grounding which was perceived as a major innovation (as well as a challenge) during this early period of the discussion but the concept of an electrical circuit. This understanding was fundamental in characterizing the Leiden jar as a new device challenging the then current knowledge of experimental practices in the field of electricity.

2018-09-27 08:38:06

September 1, 2018

3

Hist Sci

en

SAGE Journals

314-342

History of Science

Re-examining the early history of the Leiden jar

Re-examining the early history of the Leiden jar: Stabilization and variation in transforming a phenomenon into a fact

https://doi.org/10.1177/0073275318768418

56

SAGE PDF Full Text